As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases. We get commissions for purchases made through links on this website from Amazon and other third parties.
Consider purchasing a Gerber knife. In this post, we compare the strengths of the Gerber StrongArm and Gerber LMF II, two excellent knives.
You can make the best purchasing decision by using the clear description of the similarities and differences provided in this article.
If you don’t have time to read the entire article, here is a summary. Both knives are excellent fixed-blade options that work well for survival needs, however
- The Gerber StrongArm is a little bit lighter to handle, smaller, and shorter. Additionally, it is superior for bushcraft jobs. The StrongArm is a more useful knife and will be used more frequently.
- The larger, thicker, and heavier Gerber LMF II is better for bushcraft and precise tasks but less effective in harsh circumstances. It has a use, but only when certain qualities are required. less adaptable.
What’s the difference between the Gerber StrongArm vs Gerber LMF 2?
The size and weight of the Gerber StrongArm and Gerber LMF II differ most significantly from one another.
The StrongArm measures 9.88′′ in length overall, 4.8′′ in blade length, and weighs 7.2oz. In contrast, the LMF II has a comparable 4.84′′ blade length, 10.59′′ overall length, and 11.67oz weight.
Apart from that:
- It’s not quite full-tang with the LMF II. It intentionally breaks before the pommel to provide insulation from impact and electricity.
- With the built-in hammer, the LMF II has a rather hefty pommel.
- The handle of the LMF II contains lashings that you may use to attach to a spear or pole.
Due to their thickness, none of these knives do very well while cutting, but they can take a battering, are sturdy, and are simple to sharpen because to the 420HC steel. Overall not the best for bushcraft, but useful for batoning, for instance.
The StrongArm is a significantly more adaptable knife overall. The LMF II has a use, but only if the greater weight and strength are truly necessary.
More about the Gerber StrongArm
The StrongArm can be viewed as the LMF’s successor in certain ways because it is a more recent knife.
It addresses many of the LMF II problems that one could have. For instance, the lack of complete tang. Or perhaps it’s simply too hefty.
It is even more affordable, which is perhaps one of the reasons why it gained such widespread popularity.
There are several variations of the StrongArm. Basically, there are two handle colors—black or coyote brown—and two edge types—serrated vs. fine.
More about the Gerber LMF 2
Famously, the LMF II was initially intended for crews of crashed aircraft. should have sufficient strength to penetrate fuselage and other dense materials.
In the event of live wires, this is another justification for having an electrically insulated handle.
Since then, it has undoubtedly been made available for purchase to the general public, boasting the same durability as a utility/survival knife. You won’t have to worry about chipping during more difficult jobs because it is incredibly sturdy.
Jeff Freeman, who also owns his own line of rugged outdoor gear, developed it.
You may get the LMF II army knife in addition to the survival knife mentioned above. It is available in many colors, including this fantastic coyote brown.
Only the handles and sheaths change, not the blade itself.
Summary
The StrongArm will probably be the preferred knife in the majority of situations. Although the LMF II is extremely durable, it can be too huge and heavy for most applications. I hope you found this comparison of the strengths of the Gerber StrongArm and Gerber LMF II to be helpful.
It’s wonderful and a terrific knife for the task when you need it in a knife. inexpensive, well-built, and made in the USA. However, I’d venture to say that compared to instances where the StrongArm is helpful, those in which the LMF II is required are fewer and farther between.
In any case, you’ll be satisfied since these are both excellent, reliable knives.